| Author |
Topic: The Cup |
chipolata

Member
Posts: 12762
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 1:49 PM GMT
|
|
Anybody seen this yet? It's had some absolutely terrible previews, even worse than Lab Rats. Suprising considering the writers. Wouldn't it be ironic if the worst comedy on Thursday night had nothing at all to do with Seefacts?
|
|
|
| |
ContainsNuts

Member
Posts: 2134
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 1:50 PM GMT
|
|
Please, I don't think I can take another rubbish comedy.
New sketch show online! http://www.youtube.com/user/containsnutstv
Vote us Funny: http://www.funnyordie.co.uk/containsnuts
Not so new blog online: http://containsnuts.wordpress.com/
|
|
|
| |
john lucas 101

Member
Posts: 3622
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 1:54 PM GMT
|
|
It does look shit from the previews, but it's by a couple of the people from 'Absolutely', so I'll certainly give it a go.
|
|
|
| |
chipolata

Member
Posts: 12762
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 2:02 PM GMT
|
|
Even Boyd Hilton didn't rate it on Front Row, and he usually likes any old pap.
|
|
|
| |
Graham Bandage

Member
Posts: 4989
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 2:43 PM GMT
|
|
I've written a pilot for a Sunday league football team sitcom. I can't decide whether it's better for me if this is a miserable failure, or if it's a hilarious, though heartstring-tugging, laughfest.
I suspect it will make no difference, if I'm honest.
|
|
|
| |
chipolata

Member
Posts: 12762
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 3:37 PM GMT
|
|
Quote: Graham Bandage @ August 20 2008, 3:43 PM BST
I've written a pilot for a Sunday league football team sitcom. I can't decide whether it's better for me if this is a miserable failure, or if it's a hilarious, though heartstring-tugging, laughfest.
I suspect it will make no difference, if I'm honest.
View original
I had a similar predicament before Lab Rats. A sitcom about scientists. I'm still not sure whether Lab Rats has killed that genre, or paved the way for somebody to come up with a proper comedy on the subject.
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Administrator
Posts: 58338
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 4:46 PM GMT
|
|
Graham, chip, does it matter? In submitting a pilot or script sample, you should think of it more as an example and indicator of your work than locking you into that particular setting. If you have any talent, then that will show through and you'll be given a chance somewhere, regardless of your chosen sample's setting having been monopolised or killed.
No?
Aaron BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
Mark
Administrator
Posts: 2649
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 4:54 PM GMT
|
|
It's a good point Aaron. Your actual premise might be dead (as sadly commissioners are indeed alergic to greenlighting similar sitcoms - even John Sullivan and the like have fallen foul of this situation), however if your script is good, it's good.
Plus, your characters should be robust and well-rounded enough to be able to be transported into a different location anyway.
Anyway, The Cup... the whole mockumentary thing is very hard to pull off so it's brave of them to try. If it does turn out a bit rubbish though, I won't be that surprised.
Mark British Comedy Guide Editor
|
|
|
| |
Chappers

Member
Posts: 14371
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 6:49 PM GMT Edited by Chappers on August 20 2008, 6:49 PM GMT
|
|
This is something I should've done first having run a kids team for year (No - that isdn't the reason!).
If it's an Absolutlely thing then it should be worthwhile.
We've had Playing the Field about women's football, Playing for Real about Subbuteo and now this.
Quote: Graham Bandage @ August 20 2008, 3:43 PM BST
I've written a pilot for a Sunday league football team sitcom. I can't decide whether it's better for me if this is a miserable failure, or if it's a hilarious, though heartstring-tugging, laughfest.
I suspect it will make no difference, if I'm honest.
View original
I have one in mind for this though. Shall we pool our resources?
50% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
|
|
|
| |
Graham Bandage

Member
Posts: 4989
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 20, 2008, 7:30 PM GMT
|
|
Quote: David Chapman @ August 20 2008, 7:49 PM BST
This is something I should've done first having run a kids team for year (No - that isdn't the reason!).
If it's an Absolutlely thing then it should be worthwhile.
We've had Playing the Field about women's football, Playing for Real about Subbuteo and now this.
I have one in mind for this though. Shall we pool our resources?
View original
PM'ed, Chappers.
|
|
|
| |
chipolata

Member
Posts: 12762
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 21, 2008, 10:17 AM GMT
|
|
Bizarrely, Teletext have given this a really positive preview, saying it's "very funny." So maybe it's not as crap as I fear. Also, is that women in the picture on your intro screen the sexy slapper from Pulling?
|
|
|
| |
dingo

Member
Posts: 77
Location: United States
Offline
|
|
August 21, 2008, 12:02 PM GMT
|
|
Shouldn't there be an "I hate it when Brits ripoff Canadian shows" thread about this?
|
|
|
| |
Graham Bandage

Member
Posts: 4989
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 21, 2008, 12:12 PM GMT
|
|
To be fair, it is an official adaptation.
|
|
|
| |
dingo

Member
Posts: 77
Location: United States
Offline
|
|
August 21, 2008, 12:20 PM GMT
|
|
Sorry, just so accustomed to the whole "the US steals from the UK" bit, though they are also adaptations. I just wanted to point out that the UK does in fact redo foreign shows for a Brit audience.
For some reason you guys are going to see a UK Dharma and Greg.
|
|
|
| |
chipolata

Member
Posts: 12762
Location: England
Offline
|
|
August 21, 2008, 1:07 PM GMT
|
|
Is the Canadian original any good?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|