| Author |
Topic: Which sitcoms would you bring back? |
NickTheDon

Member
Posts: 919
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:29 PM BST
|
|
Quote: manchester's trendy chorlton @ May 14 2008, 8:20 PM BST
Typical provincial attitudes. But still, everyone has a right to their own opinions.
View original
No, like somebody said previously, we just don't like seeing comedies we like being remade. Like zooo said, why not show the original, or commission writers for original ideas.
What are people's thoughts on the US version of Gavin and Stacey? They're surely going to have to be so different that wouldn't it have been far easier to come up with an original comedy?
"Brace yourself Rodney..."
|
|
|
| |
zooo

Global Moderator
Posts: 17628
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:29 PM BST Edited by zooo on May 14 2008, 8:31 PM BST
|
|
Precisely.
Also, it seems like a waste of money paying the originators for the rights, when they could have probably just copied the bits they wanted, changed it a bit, and no one would have been any the wiser!
|
|
|
| |
Matthew Stott

Member
Posts: 1953
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:32 PM BST
|
|
Quote: zooo @ May 14 2008, 8:29 PM BST
Also, it seems like a waste of money paying the originators for the rights, when they could have probably just copied the bits they wanted, changed it a bit, and no one would have been any the wiser! 
View original
Yeah, its not as though the central premise of something like Gavin And Stacey is so different or unique; two people from very different home towns fall in love, both have odd families; hardly groundbreaking; why bother paying for the rights?
www.myspace.com/mvstott
|
|
|
| |
zooo

Global Moderator
Posts: 17628
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:33 PM BST
|
|
It baffles me.
I hate being baffled.
Baffle.
That is a fun word.
|
|
|
| |
Alan C
Member
Posts: 2738
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:36 PM BST
|
|
Quote: zooo @ May 14 2008, 8:33 PM BST
It baffles me.
Baffle.
That is a fun word.
View original
It rhymes with filafel but not waffle - strange?!
|
|
|
| |
NickTheDon

Member
Posts: 919
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:37 PM BST
|
|
Baffle at your waffle.
That's not a euphemism by the way.
"Brace yourself Rodney..."
|
|
|
| |
Alan C
Member
Posts: 2738
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 8:42 PM BST
|
|
Quote: NickTheDon @ May 14 2008, 8:37 PM BST
That's not a euphemism by the way.
View original
I used to play one of those in a brass band but got thrown out because my fingering was too quick!
|
|
|
| |
manchester's trendy chorlton
Member
Posts: 191
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:08 PM BST
|
|
MatthewScott, I read what you wrote and concur.
My comment was aimed at Zoo and NicktheDong; the fan-boy obsessive protectiveness, inward-looking, 'we fear change' attitudes are almost tangible. They don't want anything that they slave over remade out of some kind of entirely misplaced loyalty to the original. That is bananas.
|
|
|
| |
NickTheDon

Member
Posts: 919
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:15 PM BST
|
|
Being abusive on an internet forum - as pointless as a blunt pencil.
Why can't you debate without retorting to childish name calling? What's wrong with not wanting remakes of comedies we like?
"Brace yourself Rodney..."
|
|
|
| |
manchester's trendy chorlton
Member
Posts: 191
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:31 PM BST
|
|
Name calling? What? Where?
I have explained quite clearly what is wrong with screaming and bitching about remakes...if this was a spoken conversation I guess I would repeat it. but as it is written word, you can just look back at my previoous post.
But either way, if you're happy being a fan-boy then really, I don't mind - eeach to their own.
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Administrator
Posts: 33408
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:42 PM BST
|
|
Quote: NickTheDon @ May 14 2008, 7:20 PM BST
Father Ted would be impossible without Dermot Morgan!
View original
But as the original question was to bring back the cast as they were, the exact age and everything - so we're not talking of reviving a series, but of there actually being more episodes - that point is pretty irrelevant!
Quote: zooo @ May 14 2008, 7:48 PM BST
I don't like the idea of an American Spaced. (not that it's apparently happening anymore.)
But the transfers that make me angry and baffled are ones like the Mighty Boosh remake.
You can technically make a US version of Spaced, it has a simple plot line mentioned above. (It would be pointless in my opinion, but it can be done.)
But the Mighty Boosh isn't about the plots. It's two very specific comedians being themselves and creating their own universe.
You can't translate that!
It's fucking ridiculous.
View original
I agree in part, but does the average audience member see it like that? They just enjoy the show. It doesn't occur to them that it's the worryingly insane minds of the stars, rather than something they've created to be a show. If that makes sense. So the world which comes across on screen, and the style of humour, could be easily copied!
Aaron BSG Forums & DVDs Editor
(Half man, half Internet, half TV.) (Loyal follower of The Magical Aura of Laura.)

|
|
|
| |
Griff

Member
Posts: 2790
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:42 PM BST Edited by Griff on May 14 2008, 9:49 PM BST
|
|
Quote:
Name calling? What? Where?
You don't consider "NickTheDong" to be name calling then, MTC ?
"'Reality,' sa molesworth 2, 'is so unspeakably sordid it make me shudder.'"
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Administrator
Posts: 33408
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:44 PM BST
|
|
Quote: NickTheDon @ May 14 2008, 7:53 PM BST
Why are they bothering with remaking loads of British shows? Why not just show them more over in the States?
View original
Because the American general TV-watching public are notoriously brain-dead and unwilling to accept anything even slightly different from what they already know. If they did watch, they'd complain that they couldn't understand the accents of the Australians, and that the season was too short to bother with!
Aaron BSG Forums & DVDs Editor
(Half man, half Internet, half TV.) (Loyal follower of The Magical Aura of Laura.)

|
|
|
| |
manchester's trendy chorlton
Member
Posts: 191
Location: England
Offline
|
Oh shit, I've just re-read my post - that was a genuine typo error. Albeit an hilarious one.
Yeah that's right Aaron, that's why The Larry Sanders Show was such an unprecedented hit - because American TV audiences aren't smart.
An interesting comparison you might want to make is between Friends and Coupling. Friends was infintely smarter than Coupling and is one of the all time most successful sitcoms in America. Coupling on the other hand, is base by comparison.
|
|
|
| |
NickTheDon

Member
Posts: 919
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 14, 2008, 9:56 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Aaron @ May 14 2008, 9:44 PM BST
Because the American general TV-watching public are notoriously brain-dead and unwilling to accept anything even slightly different from what they already know. If they did watch, they'd complain that they couldn't understand the accents of the Australians, and that the season was too short to bother with!
View original
You'll be accused of having a provincial attitude with a post like that!
Regarding MTC's name calling, I wasn't even referring to NickTheDong (very inventive I must say), more the "fan boy obsessive" bits. It's quite hilarious how liking a comedy in its original state and not wanting it remade constitutes being an obsessive fan-boy.
"Brace yourself Rodney..."
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|