| Author |
Topic: Gavin & Stacey |
Tim Walker
Member
Posts: 994
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 24, 2008, 2:43 PM BST Edited by Tim Walker on May 24 2008, 2:44 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Rob B @ April 25 2008, 12:18 AM BST
Gavin and Stacey is fairly enjoyable to watch, but it's not a comedy in my opinion, and definately not a sitcom. Actually it's not even the best show Corden and Horne have appeared in together which was Teachers. Now Teachers was a show!
View original
Think that's why this show divides people on the site. It's not a sitcom, it's a half-hour continuing comedy-drama. They could have produced each series as three one hour shows. It starts out with good characters, but doesn't use them to full potential. A lot of the ongoing story arcs are predictable and there is some really lazy writing. A sitcom, however unconventional, ties up all the loose ends of a plot within 30 mins, even if that plot is part of an ongoing storyline. G&S is written more as a soap with a few jokes. (And James Corden should remember that pride cometh before a fall.)
|
|
|
| |
Matthew Stott

Member
Posts: 3240
Location: England
Online
|
|
May 24, 2008, 2:45 PM BST
|
|
Ah, another G & S basher, this site is full of 'em. Theyre all wrong of course, but theyre secure in their bile!
Tragically I was an only twin.
|
|
|
| |
Tim Walker
Member
Posts: 994
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 24, 2008, 2:47 PM BST
|
|
I didn't say I didn't enjoy G&S, did I?
|
|
|
| |
Matthew Stott

Member
Posts: 3240
Location: England
Online
|
|
May 24, 2008, 2:50 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Tim Walker @ May 24 2008, 2:47 PM BST
I didn't say I didn't enjoy G&S, did I?
View original
Um, you said something about some of the writing being lazy, it being predictable, characters not used to their potential; not exactly a ringing endorsement? I think anyone reading your review would imagine you werent that impressed with it.
Tragically I was an only twin.
|
|
|
| |
Tim Walker
Member
Posts: 994
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 24, 2008, 2:54 PM BST
|
|
Actually I enjoy it, but it's not a sitcom, that was my point. Just because something's far from perfect doesn't mean I can't enjoy it. What I enjoy most are some of the performances, which bring it up a level or three. Not all of us have to love something unconditionally.
|
|
|
| |
Matthew Stott

Member
Posts: 3240
Location: England
Online
|
|
May 24, 2008, 2:56 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Tim Walker @ May 24 2008, 2:54 PM BST
Not all of us have to love something unconditionally.
View original
Agreed, but there was still more negatives than positives in your review, so what else would people think? The last thing this bloody site needs is more G & S slagging!
Tragically I was an only twin.
|
|
|
| |
Tim Walker
Member
Posts: 994
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 24, 2008, 3:01 PM BST
|
|
Don't think I was. Sorry if you disagree. It might be that TV comedy is generally in pretty parlous state that G&S seems like a work of genius to some. It isn't, but it's an enjoyable, fun show which deserves its audience.
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Administrator
Posts: 40921
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 24, 2008, 5:15 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Matthew Stott @ May 24 2008, 2:50 PM BST
Um, you said something about some of the writing being lazy, it being predictable, characters not used to their potential; not exactly a ringing endorsement?
View original
Most of my favourite shows could get those points made about them, even by me.
Aaron BSG Forums & DVDs Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV. (Loyal follower of The Magical Aura of Laura.)

|
|
|
| |
Alan C
Member
Posts: 2738
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 24, 2008, 5:31 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Tim Walker @ May 24 2008, 3:01 PM BST
Don't think I was. Sorry if you disagree. It might be that TV comedy is generally in pretty parlous state that G&S seems like a work of genius to some. It isn't, but it's an enjoyable, fun show which deserves its audience.
View original
The test of it's quality, judging by todays benchmarks, will be how many times it is being shown in 10 years time on UKUSTVGoldfish - I suspect it will have been forgotten.
|
|
|
| |
SlagA

Moderator
Posts: 2888
Location: Wales
Offline
|
|
June 20, 2008, 6:01 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Mark @ April 25 2008, 12:24 PM BST
We'd better be careful James Cordon doesn't read this thread - he doesn't take criticism well from what I've read.
View original
Has anyone suggested he may be in the wrong business to have that attitude?
The Slagg Brothers live at: welshwriters.org.uk/slaggbrothers.
Our MySpace. Feel free to add us as friends.
Our YouTube. Subscribe to us and we'll return the compliment.
|
|
|
| |
Graham Bandage

Member
Posts: 4551
Location: England
Offline
|
|
June 23, 2008, 12:50 PM BST
|
|
Quote: SlagA @ June 20 2008, 6:01 PM BST
Has anyone suggested he may be in the wrong business to have that attitude?
View original
Yes, I thought fat people were supposed to be jolly.
I voted Obama.
|
|
|
| |
David Chapman

Member
Posts: 11011
Location: England
Offline
|
|
July 28, 2008, 10:36 PM BST
|
|
"Stacey" whatever her name is was on Loose Women today.
She said there are no plans for a third series but they're working on a Christmas special.
Playwrite extraordinaire.
http://www.eols.org.uk/
|
|
|
| |
Tim Walker
Member
Posts: 994
Location: England
Offline
|
|
July 29, 2008, 4:47 PM BST
|
|
Quote: David Chapman @ July 28 2008, 10:36 PM BST
"Stacey" whatever her name is was on Loose Women today.
She said there are no plans for a third series but they're working on a Christmas special.
View original
Yeah, well it's never felt like a show that was designed to run forever. There's only so many times G&S can row and then she pisses-off back to Barry.
|
|
|
| |
zooo

Global Moderator
Posts: 22886
Location: England
Offline
|
|
July 29, 2008, 4:48 PM BST Edited by zooo on July 29 2008, 4:49 PM BST
|
|
Quote: David Chapman @ July 28 2008, 10:36 PM BST
"Stacey" whatever her name is was on Loose Women today.
She said there are no plans for a third series but they're working on a Christmas special.
View original
She is just so flipping nice, isn't she.
I think they could squeeze another series out of it.
They could all four live together in a flat share in London. Or Wales, I suppose... nah, London.
|
|
|
| |
ContainsNuts

Member
Posts: 1601
Location: England
Offline
|
|
July 29, 2008, 4:54 PM BST
|
|
I think ending it with a one-off special is perfect for the sitcom. At the end of the day its not supposed to be a long-runner as so much changes from one episode to the next.
Unlike sitcoms like Seinfeld that reset everyone at the start of the next episode.
Some people may call me a genius but I haven't met any yet.
http://containsnuts.wordpress.com/
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|